← Search

Jana Monzel

Cincinnati, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jana Monzel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2025-07-01 · Queen City Gold · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
Janet Scruby / Angela Clark
2025-06-30 · Queen City Gold · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-24 · Queen City Gold · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-17 · Queen City Gold · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-10 · Queen City Gold · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-20 · Queen City Gold · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-05-23 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Mayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-1
L
Paula Danis / Sarah Martin
2021-09-29 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Prows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2021-06-08 · Queen City Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Halonen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2021-05-17 · Queen City Blue · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2021-03-19 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 2-4
L
2021-02-19 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Prows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
25%
6W–18L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe