← Search

Daniel Prihoda

— year-end
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2020–2022

Captains: add Daniel Prihoda to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2022-11-19 · C 8.5M CC Slomski · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denis Isaev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Thomas Michalski / Mike Lee
2022-10-30 · C 8.5M CC Slomski · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denis Isaev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-10-08 · C 8.5M CC Slomski · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Denis Isaev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2022-07-14 · A18 4.0M A MM1 Cerveny · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lustre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-06-30 · A18 4.0M A MM1 Cerveny · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lustre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-06-09 · A18 4.0M A MM1 Cerveny · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lustre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-04-09 · C 6.5M CC1 Ganim · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Ganim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2022-04-02 · C 6.5M CC1 Ganim · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Ganim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-20 · C 6.5M CC1 Ganim · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Ganim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-03-13 · C 6.5M CC1 Ganim · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jinho Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-02-06 · C 6.5M CC1 Ganim · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Razum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Robert Moore / Chris Hensley
2020-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Cerveny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams4 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.8% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 35.2% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe