← Search

Thomas Michalski

— year-end
114 matches · 88W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thomas Michalski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-07-23 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rick Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garrett Cona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Iler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Phong Nguyen / Chris Corbin
2026-07-06 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Christman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Iler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Louis Konstan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Baranek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-06-03 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Louis Konstan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Phong Nguyen / Timothy Jones
2026-06-01 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Christman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · A18 4.5M SP Harris · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Mollison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-11 · A40 4.5M SP Morse · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Iler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
76.8%
63W–19L · 60.3% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
87.5%
21W–3L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal