← Search

Rick Tao

— year-end
112 matches · 83W–29L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Rick Tao to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Tao (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Arnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Tao · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Arnstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rob Lombardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edwin Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Tao · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Novatny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Abramson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Schnellaveria (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cyrus Mevorach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Huewe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Abramson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-15 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Abramson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Abramson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-2
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.7% of games
4.5
82.5%
66W–14L · 61.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert