← Search

Eric Abramson

Saint Louis, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 104W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Abramson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
Michael Ho / Sam Edwards
2026-08-31 · Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ray Ohara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Schneller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Schneller/Schmedeke · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melanie Ortega mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · Schneller/Schmedeke · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katelyn Schmedeke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Ariston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Guillaume Huchet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · STL/Tao/40&Over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Ariston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rick Tao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · Schnellaveria (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Neale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rick Tao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-15 · Schnellaveria (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rick Tao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 57.9% of games
4.0
93.5%
43W–3L · 62.2% of games
4.5
51.2%
21W–20L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 60.5% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe