Tracy Lamerato
Beverly Hills, MI
173 matches · 96W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Tracy Lamerato to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history173 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Anna Olekszyk / Kate Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
BT- Ebert 18s 4.0 NW F3
BT-Belleau-Mills 55s 7.0 DW F2
FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F
FAC-Harbar 55s 8.0 DW F
FAC-Harbar 55s 8.0 NW F
FAC-Stieber 7.0X 55&O F
TROY-Hill 40s 4.0 DW F
TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3
TROY-Segerlind 40s 3.5 NW F3
TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F
WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F
WESS-Brown 40&O 70 Mix F
WESS-Fitzpatrick/Harbar 7.5W Thurs Day Combo F
WESS-Mizuno LOW TRI DAY Women
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
80.8%
42W–10L · 60.1% of games
4.0
28.4%
19W–48L · 41.4% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 50% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.