← Search

Eduardo Monsivais

Auburn Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 72W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Eduardo Monsivais to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-08-12 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Kill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
Brett Thompson / Avi Ravindra
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Timothy Nickel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Lamerato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · LT-Revello 18s 4.0M F4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-26 · FAC-Alaimo 18s 3.5M F6 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
BHAGIRATH SHEKHAWAT
2026-06-24 · FAC-Alaimo 18s 3.5M F6 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Krauss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Li-Cheng Hsu / Kevin Nowalski
2026-06-17 · FAC-Alaimo 18s 3.5M F6 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Fleischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Treece mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
3.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.6% of games
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.4% of games
5.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.8% of games
6.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 69.4% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 49.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
10%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer