← Search

Julia Bartram

— year-end
238 matches · 115W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julia Bartram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
L
2026-07-27 · 55 7.0W E NR Gallagher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Kneiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · 55 7.0W E NR Gallagher · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Boll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · 55 7.0W E NR Gallagher · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · 55 7.0W E NR Gallagher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Mays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · A40 3.5W NR Kneiss · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Pecko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-08 · A55 7.0W NR Gallagher · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Boll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-11 · A55 7.0W NR Gallagher · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Slattery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · A55 7.0W NR Gallagher · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Marcie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-21 · C 7.5W NR Bartram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · A18 3.5W NR Kneiss · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Boll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 2 NR Boll · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Kneiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-16 · A40 3.5W NR Kneiss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Boll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 41.4% of games
3.5
63.3%
50W–29L · 54.5% of games
4.0
20.8%
11W–42L · 40.4% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 53% of games
7.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 55.3% of games
7.5
44.7%
17W–21L · 49.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova