← Search

Jeanne MacKay

Lakewood, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 54W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanne MacKay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-07-15 · A65 7.0W2 PW Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Lanigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · A65 7.0W2 PW Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Hoty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · A55 7.0W D PW2 Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Rohweder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · A65 7.0W2 PW Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Lanigan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
Barbara Dunagan / Connie Wang
2026-06-10 · A65 7.0W2 PW Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Hoty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
Nancy Kinnett / Candace Kelly
2026-06-08 · A55 7.0W D PW2 Reid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · A65 7.0W2 PW Smith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sunnie Bauer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-18 · A55 7.0W D PW2 Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · A55 7.0W PW2 Reid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Dewerth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-01 · A55 7.0W PW2 Reid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Lucey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-18 · A55 7.0W PW2 Reid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Dewerth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · A55 7.0W PW2 Reid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.9%
33W–23L · 53.5% of games
7.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova