← Search

Hyejung Oh

Bakersfield, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 36W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Hyejung Oh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briana Starr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Tkac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Becca Ferguson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Natalie Chene championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Natalie Chene championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Chene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth van Voorhis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Chene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becca Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Chene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Bako - Team Holliday 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley South
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · Bako - LLW - Team Oh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Nicholas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 65.2% of games
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 57.7% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert