← Search

Natalie Chene

— year-end
56 matches · 43W–13L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Natalie Chene to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheridan Hadaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Team Chene/Broussard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheridan Hadaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Hyejung Oh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Hyejung Oh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Team Chene/Broussard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · Team Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hyejung Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 18AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hyejung Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edyta Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edyta Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · Bako - LLLW - Team Chene · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hyejung Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.6% of games
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.5% of games
4.0
75%
12W–4L · 54.5% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert