← Search

Alice Napolitano

POINT PLEASANT BORO, NJ
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 42W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alice Napolitano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-06-04 · NJD/Shot Sisters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Stanyek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · NJD/Shot Sisters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Stanyek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-16 · Rygh · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Mellett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-14 · Rygh · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-12 · Tri Luv · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Cane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-09-08 · Tri Luv · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Ricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-05-17 · Green Knoll 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eva Danieli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-10 · Green Knoll 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marilyn Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Linda Miller / Leslie Donato Schwab
2023-10-28 · NJD/Cane · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Cane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-10-15 · NJD/Cane · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Cane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-10-01 · NJD/Cane · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcie Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 55.1% of games
4.5
50%
16W–16L · 49.6% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams