← Search

Amy Penn

Belmar, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 99W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Penn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Melinda Fellingham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Melinda Fellingham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Sophisticated Ladies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanna Smit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Sophisticated Ladies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lori Husak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-11 · Sophisticated Ladies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janice Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Diane Ticse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
3.5
74.4%
32W–11L · 57.6% of games
4.0
32.4%
24W–50L · 43% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.5% of games
8.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Singles
16%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal