← Search

Darian Spell

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 91W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Darian Spell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Collin Backus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Blais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim Driscoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · Gr.Swank40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3
L
2026-07-30 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Hoomani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Gr.Swank40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Summer DuMont mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-26 · Gr.Swank40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Pirrung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · Jo.Hoomani40T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Beyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-05 · Gr.Swank40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Walton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · Gr.Beyer40A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rahul Arora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 64.4% of games
3.5
42.2%
27W–37L · 45.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 24.5% of games
6.5
65%
26W–14L · 57.6% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 50.6% of games
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 62.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams