← Search

Hilary Tew

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 65W–57L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Hilary Tew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-31 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katya Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Ki.Patrey18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · MLong.8.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jenna Schreiber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Ki.Patrey18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · TOC.Kim · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Reiff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · Ki.Patrey18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kazmierczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · TOC.Kim · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Reiff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-07-11 · MLong.4.0T-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Bedolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · Ke.Williams40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Ke.Williams40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Koves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-04 · MLong.4.0T-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Bedolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Caroline Smith / Hayley Cain
2026-07-01 · Ki.Patrey18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
65.1%
28W–15L · 56.7% of games
4.0
50%
18W–18L · 52.5% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#1 Singles
30%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
12%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe