← Search

Nancy Paskevich

— year-end
115 matches · 67W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Paskevich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-21 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith O'Hara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Kamensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-19 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-05 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Tewksbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · Midwest/Lockert/55&O/6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Lockert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-10-24 · C 6.5W CV1 Derbyshire · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-28 · Midwest/Lockert/55&O/6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Lockert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-15 · A40 3.0W CV Urbanowski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-12 · OD 3.0W CV Urbanowski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Erb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.8%
42W–26L · 56% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.5% of games
6.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe