← Search

Ruth Meadows

— year-end
132 matches · 72W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ruth Meadows to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janel Ciolli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fran Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Neag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-14 · A55 6.0W TP1 Coon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Koran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · A55 6.0W TP Coon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · A18 3.0W TP1 Laux · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Fran Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-19 · A55 6.0W TP Coon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Schaffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · A18 3.0W TP1 Laux · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-19 · NEO/Coon/A55&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Voth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-17 · A18 3.0W TP1 Ciolli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janel Ciolli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-30 · NEO/Coon/A55&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janel Ciolli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-06-24 · A40 3.0W TP1 Dean · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janel Ciolli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
58.3%
42W–30L · 52.5% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.4% of games
6.0
63%
17W–10L · 56.8% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova