← Search

Debbie Messmer

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
408 matches · 245W–163L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Messmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history408 matches
W
2026-09-09 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · SCC - Capozello-18 WeekDAY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Manners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · MAC - Messmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Barefoot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · SCC - Capozello-18 WeekDAY · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Maliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · MAC - Messmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanisha Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · MAC Greenspoon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Greenspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-4
W
2026-08-18 · SCC - Capozello-18 WeekDAY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-0
W
Lara Green / Daniela Otto
2026-08-17 · MAC - Messmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · MAC Rhodus 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rebecca Haener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
2026-08-10 · MAC - Messmer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
58.7%
115W–81L · 54.1% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games
7.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 57.6% of games
8.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.7% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.2%
30W–11L · 58.5% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
60.7%
34W–22L · 50.9% of games
8.5mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 54.6% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
10W–20L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
181 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
126 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
94 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova