← Search

Kim Weis

— year-end
86 matches · 54W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kim Weis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Burkwood Butterworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Denunzio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · Burkwood Row · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Row
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Burkwood Row · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Row
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Burkwood Row · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
W
2026-07-22 · Burkwood Butterworth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leanne Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Burkwood Row · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rochelle Purmasir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-03 · Burkwood Kampinga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberley Winn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · Burkwood Kampinga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Burkwood - Jennifers - Owens · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leanne Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Burkwood - Jennifers - Owens · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · Burkwood Decker · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · Burkwood - Jennifers - Owens · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
64.4%
38W–21L · 55% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams