← Search

James Armstrong

Montgomery, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 24W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add James Armstrong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-18 · MCC Long · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cooper Trent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · MCC Cone · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · MG Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clayton Muller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · Lagoon Loe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Gallion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
W
2025-10-22 · MG - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitchell Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-15 · MG - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Kempter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-08 · MG - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Herndon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-07 · MG Loe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Winn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · Lagoon Loe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Bradshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-01 · MG - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-30 · MG Loe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Winn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-08-19 · O'Connor- Crenshaw · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lance Covert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 47.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer