← Search

John Crenshaw

— year-end
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add John Crenshaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-07-09 · O'Connor Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jarred Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · O'Connor Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Nettelhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · MG Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-27 · MG Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · MG Campbell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chase Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-08-21 · O'Connor-Crenshaw · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jarred Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-08-19 · O'Connor- Crenshaw · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hunter Bronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-18 · MCC Cone · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jae Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-07 · O'Connor-Crenshaw · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bobby Trott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-06 · O'Connor- Crenshaw · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hunter Bronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-28 · MCC Cone · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jae Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-07-23 · O'Connor- Crenshaw · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Kempter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.3% of games
8.5
70%
7W–3L · 61.4% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer