← Search

Neil Schmitz

— year-end
103 matches · 55W–48L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Neil Schmitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-06-18 · Burgess, Randy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Grant Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Bohning, Brandon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juan Carlos Baldelomar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Bohning, Brandon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Herbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Bohning, Brandon · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tanenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seth Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-22 · Schmitz, Michael · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Ammatelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Hargroves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-22 · Schwabauer, Doug · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Earl Pardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-10 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Hargroves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-06-08 · Schwabauer, Doug · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rory Ramsdell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-03 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 52.4% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.1% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.2% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe