← Search

Jeff Hargroves

Kansas City, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 28W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeff Hargroves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-06-18 · Burgess, Randy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-30 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Lawlor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tanenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Burgess, Randy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Gassie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Burgess, Randy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumud Pyakuryal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · Burgess, Randy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-12-06 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Allman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neil Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · Schmitz, Michael · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 59.7% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal