← Search

Linda Yarnell

— year-end
84 matches · 42W–42L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Linda Yarnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2024-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
Ann Brown / Sara Clarkson
2023-09-29 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Freas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-15 · Aceing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Gaffney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-08-14 · Aceing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Freas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-07-10 · Aceing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Blumberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-08-25 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tre Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-08-09 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Dennison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2022-07-29 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hope Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-13 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tre Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-11 · Bellevue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Peipher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2022-06-25 · Fincher · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ling Lee Dietrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-06-22 · Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hope Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams7 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
55.1%
27W–22L · 51.3% of games
7.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert