← Search

Debra Sklar

Lexington, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 57W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Debra Sklar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-09-02 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Nicholson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · LATA55/Sklar/LCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Dickerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-25 · LATA40/Mathews/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Cupertino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Pruett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · LATA55/Sklar/LCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Pender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · LATA55/Sklar/LCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · LATA40/Mathews/CAMP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chrissy Boone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · LATA40/Mathews/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chrissy Boone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · LATA40/RANGEL/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Howker Amick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · LATA40/Mathews/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Belquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · LATA 3.5M 55 & Over (Amick) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Sklar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 54.5% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.3% of games
7.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 39.7% of games
3.5mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe