← Search

Laura Wetzel

— year-end
63 matches · 35W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Laura Wetzel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Cheryl Pawlowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cheryl Pawlowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Cheryl Pawlowski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · PINELLAS/Abrams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Pawlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 53.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.9% of games
8.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams