← Search

Caralyn Paul

Gibsonton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
454 matches · 289W–165L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caralyn Paul to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history454 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Arbor Greene LOVAS 18+ 7.5 Combo/Paul · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vera Dikmen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bastian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Center
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-15 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bastian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · HCC Tennis / J. Price · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irene Nasworthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Center
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Center
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-23 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-18 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Center
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · Arbor Green / C.Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
75.3%
113W–37L · 59.2% of games
4.0
49.5%
55W–56L · 48.3% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 58.8% of games
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 64.4% of games
7.5
62.9%
22W–13L · 57.3% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
81.5%
22W–5L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
162 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
121 matches
#1 Singles
4%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer