← Search

Elisabeth Johnson

Minneapolis, MN
4.5D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
16 matches · 13W–3L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Elisabeth Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-09-10 · BaerenwaldFall2026OneDubs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alesha Baerenwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · BaerenwaldFall2026OneDubs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alesha Baerenwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · BaerenwaldFall2026OneDubs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thao Nguyen Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · Jorgenson-Bowles Point Taken · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taylor Reiners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-16 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-31 · Finley: Wellies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rory Osberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · Finley: Wellies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Finley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-09 · Fred Wells Gordon 10:30am · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
W
2026-03-03 · Townsend/Osberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-24 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-23 · Fred Wells Gordon 10:30am · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 66.3% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#2 Singles
31%
5 matches
#1 Singles
19%
3 matches
#3 Singles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova