Tanja Boskovic
Elk Grove Village, IL
330 matches · 194W–136L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Tanja Boskovic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history330 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Melissa Ko - * / Alja Hessami-Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams102 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 1.Wilm Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W3.5 1.Tam Lund Sat 1 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 6.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $29
NITA E 35W40h Wilmette- Lam
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 1Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M40&O7.0 1RT Schoyer Sat 7 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 4.Wilm Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 4.Wilm Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O7.0 2.RT Schoyer Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWMid 6.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 8.Wlmt Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW3.5 5.Tam Lund Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W M40&O7.0 3.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $27
NITA E 40W40c River Trails-Lund/Lam
NITA E 80MX40d NMHFCH-Lawver
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 70MX18a Racket Club-Lawver
NITA W 75CMXb NMHFCH-Lawver
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.9%
90W–53L · 55.3% of games
4.0
45.2%
28W–34L · 49.1% of games
7.5
50%
14W–14L · 49.7% of games
10.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
71.1%
32W–13L · 59.5% of games
7.5mixed
60%
12W–8L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 59.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
118 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
95 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.