← Search

Rebecca Collins

Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 73W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Collins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Deborah Diver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Elizabeth McBride / Linda Platt
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Deborah Diver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Leslie Smith
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Court Queens · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Court Queens · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Erkenbrecher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · SETs APPEAL · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Sharon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · SETs APPEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · SETs APPEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robyn Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · SETs APPEAL · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-04 · SETs APPEAL · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Court Queens · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
45%
49W–60L · 46.6% of games
3.5
32.6%
14W–29L · 42.3% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Singles
18%
33 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams