← Search

Donna Mill

West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 102W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Donna Mill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history194 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Pam Sorg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Maggie Felton / Janet Murphy
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Pam Sorg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Alley Girls 2.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Giacomucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tammy Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Farcht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wanda Prosser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Joanne Uhle / Susan Sullivan
2026-07-01 · Alley Girls 2.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jamie Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-3
W
2026-06-29 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Buckanavage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Sorg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Absolut Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Falkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 21.4% of games
3.0
64.6%
51W–28L · 56.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
12W–30L · 43.2% of games
6.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 60.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.7% of games
6.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
37 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams