← Search

Andrea Fleischman

MILFORD, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 62W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Fleischman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-05-23 · MD: MadRakets:Bilskis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Wildermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · MD: MadRakets:Bilskis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Goldfeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · MAD:MadRackets:Bilskis/Goldfeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-07 · MAD:MadRackets:Bilskis/Goldfeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-05 · MIT:BB's Winter:DeAngelis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · MAD:MadRackets:Bilskis/Goldfeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-11 · MAD:MadRackets:Bilskis/Goldfeder · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-04 · MIT:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Kaya · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · MIT:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Kaya · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-6
L
2025-12-05 · MIT:BB's Winter:DeAngelis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-09 · MIT:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Kaya · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-5
L
2025-10-25 · MIT:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Kaya · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
82.5%
33W–7L · 63.4% of games
3.5
37.1%
26W–44L · 47.3% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 75% of the time
#1 Singles
75%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova