← Search

Siobhan Hart

Saratoga Springs, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 60W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Siobhan Hart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-27 · SRYMCA 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Zogby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesa Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Queens Court 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesa Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Saratoga Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Kathleen Moran / Kevin O'Connor
2026-06-14 · SRYMCA 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryant Jarocki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Queens Court 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Kruk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · Saratoga Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maura Agati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Queens Court 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Saratoga Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marianne Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · SRYMCA 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryant Jarocki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.5% of games
3.5
53.7%
29W–25L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer