← Search

Michelle Bollacker

Glenville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 155W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Bollacker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Gillian Cobb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Beverly Swimm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Isabelle Jarocki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Isabelle Jarocki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Isabelle Jarocki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Close Call · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Floor Blindenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · Close Call · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Floor Blindenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Wishart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Swimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Close Call · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Sfeir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · Northern: Hot Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Paolino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.2%
34W–19L · 57.5% of games
3.5
61.5%
40W–25L · 55.4% of games
4.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.3% of games
6.0
100%
13W–0L · 68.8% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer