← Search

John Lockhead

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 51W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Lockhead to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-08-26 · NBuckley-HR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bart Cleary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · LStanek-HR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Stanek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
James White / Sarah Franks
2026-07-09 · LStanek-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Ware mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-02 · LStanek-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pilneyo Seo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · LStanek-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Gillie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-20 · JLockhead-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Haine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · NBuckley-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-30 · JLockhead-HR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Haine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · NBuckley-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Bolduc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Ricky Ayers / Edward Hennessey
2026-03-23 · JLockhead-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-11 · JLockhead-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-09 · JLockhead-HR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Spurrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
52.7%
29W–26L · 50.6% of games
7.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.5% of games
3.5mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
31 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer