← Search

Steve Haine

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 53W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Haine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-09-09 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · JMontague.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Schumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Edmunds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanner Dellinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Mark Bland / Amy Lynch
2026-07-21 · KLaan-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · KLaan-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karli Eller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · KLaan-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karli Eller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
David Belcher / Daniel Allen
2026-06-07 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JAMES MONTAGUE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · KLaan-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Franks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
Ryan Curet / Jordan Curet
2026-04-25 · JMontague-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Rogge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · JLockhead-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Lockhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.3% of games
4.0
37%
10W–17L · 44.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 44% of games
3.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 70.9% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer