← Search

Marisa Grotell

Collegeville, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 169W–149L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marisa Grotell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history318 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Lambe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Willard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · DownRight Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Lambe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · 3.5 Amigos (40+) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lois Kester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Super Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Mcgrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Lambe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · 3.5 Amigos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Giacobbe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · 3.5 Amigos (40+) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Levins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Laura Petersen / Elizabeth Stahl
2026-06-12 · Super Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Mcgrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.7%
84W–59L · 55.7% of games
3.5
49.3%
36W–37L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
21.4%
6W–22L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
104 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
85 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
31 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer