← Search

Camila Gomes Santos Grilanda

Malvern, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 75W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Camila Gomes Santos Grilanda to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Elyse Salek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Natasha Smith / Michaela Kulbartz
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Elyse Salek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Carol DiBari championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Elyse Salek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Rian Larkin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Netchix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elyse Salek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-24 · Netchix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rian Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Netchix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elyse Salek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Netchix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elyse Salek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Jennifer Jones / Kathleen Hubbert
2026-05-21 · Netchix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elyse Salek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Dana Cook / Erica Mcgrath
2026-05-15 · Netchix 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rian Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Netchix 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rian Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.9% of games
3.0
87%
20W–3L · 65.7% of games
3.5
68%
34W–16L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova