← Search

Helen Ericson

PHILADELPHIA, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 32W–40L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Helen Ericson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Wentz/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gina O'Neil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Wentz/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Olga Sokolov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-29 · Wentz/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristi Leach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Wentz/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Olga Sokolov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · Epps/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Herzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-17 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Wentz/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Herzog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Szwarc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Barbara Woods / Gwen Holloway
2026-05-02 · Wentz/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jo Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Epps/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-19 · Wentz/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hensley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
21W–21L · 50% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 23.1% of games
6.5
60%
9W–6L · 52.4% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer