← Search

Ginger Arthur

Knoxville, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 50W–45L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ginger Arthur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
Laura Warrick / Whitney Gooch
2026-09-08 · Martin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · RoseRhody/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Martha Filipkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-27 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Ericson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · Martin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Arthur/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heath Mckeehan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
Jeanne Bernier / Mike Bernier
2026-06-28 · Arthur/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Burke Arthur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Arthur/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Ericson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Uhlenhake/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · Maccagli/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Osborne-Martz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-29 · Uhlenhake/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Osborne-Martz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
27W–9L · 61.5% of games
3.5
16.7%
5W–25L · 37.4% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 52.9% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer