← Search

Brenda Bourn

Lk Havasu Cty, AZ
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 62W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brenda Bourn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-04-26 · Garard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · Garard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johanna Steigerwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · Garard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Mitsuyuki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Garard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roberta Bloss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · SPR1passed - 3.0 ISP Blue X40S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leo Serrano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Garard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · SPR1passed - 3.0 ISP Blue X40S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Recknor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · SPR1passed - 3.0 ISP Blue X40S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dylan Fields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
L
2026-02-14 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-14 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 71.6% of games
3.0
63.8%
44W–25L · 55.1% of games
3.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 44.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert