← Search

Jennifer Recknor

Flagstaff, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 17W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Recknor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Rice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Boyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · Rice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ron Gray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Pappas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Penna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-22 · Penna · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cory Berry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Ariana Guaraqui / Shaun Stouder
2026-04-15 · Penna · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Rice mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
CORI CUSKER / Julija Cvetkova
2026-03-29 · NAZ/Radavich/40&over/3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Ruelas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · NAZ/Hopmeyer/18&over/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Bourn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
18 matches
#1 Singles
29%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams