← Search

Dung Le

Kansas City, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 19W–14L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Dung Le to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2025-09-24 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-08-20 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-02 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-23 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-09 · Pattabiraman Karthick · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-06 · MO/Beck-Mathew/Mid-TriW · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2024-10-03 · Pattabiraman Karthick · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-07-19 · Beck, Jacob · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michaela Henne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-06-30 · Beck, Jacob · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Catherine Henne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-28 · Beck, Jacob · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Josephine Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-27 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-06-25 · Chen, Aaron · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Enkhsaikhan Erdenechimeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.2% of games
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 45% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams