← Search

Jeffrey Marcott

Independence, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 87W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Marcott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Smith, John · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Smith, John · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blair Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blair Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Rook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-19 · HOA/Jackson/65&over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Kalic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Norman Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · HOA/Jackson/65&over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Rendleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
55.4%
62W–50L · 52.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 35% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.6% of games
8.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 54.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King