← Search

Maripat Rafferty

— year-end
91 matches · 28W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maripat Rafferty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-08-15 · Pittsburgh Area Women 55+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beverly Varnay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · Pittsburgh Area Women 55+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Casale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · Brady's Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Klesic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · Pittsburgh Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marybrooke Burval
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · Pittsburgh Smash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Brethauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · Pittsburgh Smash · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Gossel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
L
2026-07-10 · Brady's Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Brady's Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Brady's Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rita Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-16 · Pittsburgh Mix & Serve · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felipe Cavalcanti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 46.2% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–20L · 26% of games
6.0mixed
35.5%
11W–20L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer