← Search

Amy Carpenter

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 55W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Carpenter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-03 · MEA RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-27 · MEA RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · MEA RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Barsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · MEA GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · MEA GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kira Zana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · MEA RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie von Eschen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kira Zana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · MEA RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristy Westnedge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · MEA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · MEA GREEN · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · MEA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
86.7%
26W–4L · 63.4% of games
3.5
44.2%
23W–29L · 47.9% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova