← Search

Rebecca Strobel

— year-end
256 matches · 153W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Strobel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
L
2026-09-12 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-22 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiane Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Price championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Ann Baer / Debra Benge
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Price championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Carrie Poulsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams63 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
79.5%
35W–9L · 62.6% of games
3.5
57.6%
68W–50L · 54% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 39.4% of games
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 40.8% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
104 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
54 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer