← Search

Rick Hildebrand

— year-end
90 matches · 50W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rick Hildebrand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-04-01 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/18&O/4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andy Palmer / Alex Gray
2026-03-18 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/18&O/4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · PHX/Bachus/Brockway/40&O/4.0X · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
Jose Desiongco / Brian Smith
2026-03-14 · PHXWC/ Snider/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-28 · PHXWC/ Snider/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-23 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/40&O/4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · PHX/Bachus/Brockway/40&O/4.0X · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Brockway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-21 · PHXWC/ Snider/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Leinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-09 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/40&O/4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-04 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/18&O/4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-01 · PHX/Bachus/Brockway/40&O/4.0X · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Brockway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-28 · PHX/BrelsfordJackson/18&O/4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Matson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
67.4%
31W–15L · 57.8% of games
4.5
35%
7W–13L · 40.9% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.6% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe