← Search

Angela Dyer

Cleveland, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 82W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Dyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Borchert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · A40 4.0W MM Fenner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Todaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-06 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Zalar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan McCaulley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Allin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan McCaulley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Jennifer Kirchner / Hilary Rossi
2026-06-01 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Zalar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-27 · A40 4.0W MM Fenner · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-27 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-13 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan McCaulley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · C 7.5W CC Garson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Marotta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 56% of games
3.5
62.9%
39W–23L · 57.3% of games
4.0
25%
8W–24L · 40.4% of games
6.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 55% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal