← Search

Meghan McCaulley

— year-end
65 matches · 52W–13L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Meghan McCaulley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Garson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Garson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Cugliari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Cugliari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michelle Simmons / Andrea Brown
2026-05-01 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Cugliari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Cugliari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-13 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-08 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridgette Palus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Cugliari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 70.8% of games
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.9% of games
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 49.2% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 69.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams